When we consider the topic of mass tourism in mount Everest, the first thing that comes to mind is economy and progress. But is mass tourism in mount Everest really the best option when it comes to travel. This essay will look into the advantages and disadvantages of travel to the Everest.
Many argue that mass tourism in mount Everest is the wisest choice as it allows people who live there to improver their economy and there is no denying that mass tourism in mount Everest is also a reasonable course of action for those who wish to achieve progress.
Yet, there are factors like spoil the environment or the pollution that should also be taken into account in order to make the best choice. There is much more to life than just economy or progress. According to the latest research, 75% of native people value the defence of the environment over the economy. Also, if you consider the fact that pollution plays a crucial role in native´s lifestyle, then mass tourism in mount Everest does not seem to be such a great idea after all.
Moreover, mass tourism in the Everest has two additional major disadvantages, namely increase the risk of the trip and substantial lifestyle changes in native people.
If increase the risk of the trip ranks high on your priority list, then mass tourism in mount Everest should definitely be out of the question. And last, but certainly not least, you must consider whether substantial lifestyle changes in native people is a problem for you. If so, then less tourism in the Everest is likely to be a much better option for you.
To sum up, although on the face of it mass tourism in mount Everest sounds like a good idea when it comes to travel, a more in-depth analysis suggests otherwise. In fact, most evidence points to the fact that if spoilt the environment, pollution, increase the risk of the trip and substantial lifestyle changes in native people is what you are after, then less tourism in mount Everest will probably work best for you.